Thursday, July 28, 2011

Only When I Stop To Think About It

Earlier this week our President came out and requested a prime time audience to deliver a message. There wasn't much political commentary by the pundits immediately after his speech because it was too important to get back to the interrupted programming. The next morning the assessment of his speech came in and the biggest knock on the message was it didn't really offer anything new. Even many Democratic strategist and pundits stated it seemed "outdated". All along the Republicans have criticized the President for not presenting a plan. Makes you wonder why they walked out on several meetings with him and claimed he "moved the goalposts". What goalposts?



When I listened to the President's speech the thing that resonated with me was the fact he called on people, citizens, to contact their congressmen and voice their opinions. President Obama suggested compromise, but that wasn't anything he hadn't said before. The only thing that seemed new to me, in a speech that was critiqued as offering "nothing new" by most, was his call to the people to let their congressmen know how they felt and how they wanted the situation resolved. I'm sure this has probably been done before but I don't recall anytime too recently where the President requested a national television audience and the crux of his message was to encourage people to get in touch with their representatives.

I followed the news, specifically on this issue about people contacting their representatives, and from most reports I read it seems people actually did this. Many office headquarters reported large amounts of voice mail and email contacts. Many citizens reported receiving busy signals when trying to contact their congressmen all across the land. I have also followed the polls and it seems clear the vast majority of Americans, regardless of their party affiliation, seem to agree that compromise is the only real solution.



This made me wonder if one of our local congressman had received larger than normal contacts from his constituents. I visited his public Facebook page to see if we, right here at home, believed in compromise as the best remedy. Below is what I found. All replies are in order they took place, from newest to oldest, in the last twelve hours on Congressman Devin Nunes' public figure Facebook page. The only thing not included is comments that shared links.


Please vote No on raising the Debt Ceiling!!!!!! I want my Kids to have a Country to be Proud of....... Not one that is Owned by China........



Please Congressman Nunes, NO MORE DEBT. We the People are begging you to listen to us!! We do not want the debt ceiling raised. PLEASE DO NOT VOTE FOR BOEHNER'S BILL. Thank you!!



Congressman Nunes, NO MORE DEBT! I've listened to you. I know you have the guts to do the right thing! DO NOT ALLOW THE DEBT CEILING TO BE RAISED. DO NOT VOTE FOR BOEHNER'S BILL!



politicians will not have the guts to do the right thing unless we hav ethe guts to hold them accountable, regardless of party. if we complain, but then vote them back in, we are to blame. NO MORE DEBT, period. We are watching and those who fail and betray us will be held accountable!



Our country will never be the same based on the insurmountable debt. Voting to increase the debt ceiling is just going to worsen the inevitable pain for what lies ahead. We must stop the spending. Please vote no on raising the ceiling.



Please do not raise the debt!!



The nation is headed for a cliff at 90 mph. If all we do is slow down to 85 mph (the Boehner bill), we're still going over the cliff!!! It may take a short time longer, but it WILL happen! How on earth do we have a party that hasn't passed a budget in 2 1/2 years lecturing us about fiscal responsibility??? How on earth do we allow the party that cut $1/2 trillion out of Medicare to make the numbers work on Obamacare get by with accusing Paul Ryan's plan of destroying Medicare??? Take back the message! Please!



‎Boehners bill is NOT ecceptable. compromise is how we got into this mess. Call Obama's bluff !



Do not vote to raise the debt ceiling!



NO MORE DEBT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!​!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Please don't fold. We need to make some tough choices and it does not seem as though the Republican Leadership has the cohones to make the right ones. Please don't leave this mess for our children. Vote NO on Boehner's plan.




You are one of my favorite congressmen. I honestly do not think the new plan by the speaker will do anything to right the ship. In fact I believe it will hurt far more than doing nothing. I urge you to vote against it and only vote for something that may really keep us from further financial hardship. The cut Cap and balance (I am against it) at least has a chance of helping the situation. what would be the best in my opinion, is to do nothing for now, and as a congress cut funding to all things Obama wants to fund that are unnessary, and do not allow any expendatures that exceed revenues. That would actually help.





Congressman Nunes. No More Debt!



Congressman Nunes, Boehner is not your boss, your constituents are. Listen to us and vote AGAINST Boehner's bill. The Central Valley is hurting big time and this will be another nail in the coffin. Do you want this on your shoulders and in your conscience if you vote with Boehner. I pray you don't. Please vote AGAINST Boehner's bill. Thank you.



This insistence on no reform reinforces the notion that our entitlement state is too big to afford but also too big to change politically. This is how a AAA country becomes AA, the first step on the march to Greece.



Vote No on the Boehner bill. The message that bill sends to conservatives is business as usual inside the Beltway. Be a leader and do the right thing.



STOP THE GAMES! Its time to quit playing games with the people of America, WE said NO to raising the debt ceiling, what is it about NO do you people that we elected NOT understand? Boehners plan is NOT acceptable, we need huge cuts not more available to spend on useless programs and paybacks to UNIONS and left organizations. VOTE NO ON THIS USELESS PIECE OF GARBAGE!



No on the Boehner plan!



Devin, I implore you!!! DO NOT ACCEPT BOENOR'S PROPOSAL!!! THE PEOPLE WILL BACK YOU. BOENOR'S PLAN IS IMPOTENT!!! IT CONTAINS NO ACTUAL CUTS, JUST STAVING OFF FUTURE SPENDING INCREASE. PLEASE, VOTE NO ON BOENOR'S PLAN, DEFAULT IS A MYTH AND A SCARE TACTIC!!!



CUT, CAP AND INITIATE A BALANCE BUDGET AMENDMENT.



If you want to restore the Republic, you will vote against raising the debt ceiling! Stick to your guns!!



Listen to your constituents. Do not raise the debt ceiling!



Listen to your constituents, do not vote to raise the debt ceiling!!



I will borrow some words from a good friend in hopes that you will understand, " Color me stupid. I'm still trying to figure out why you have to borrow more money so you can spend less and how do you owe less after you borrow more??"



Mr. Boehner, YOU need to get YOUR ass in line with what the majority of Americans are telling YOU... NO MORE DEBT! Prioritize your payments like any NORMAL household must do when they live in REALITY! .... you know, where money CAN'T be printed!



The Boehner plan is No deal that is acceptable for the future of America. And Rep. Boehner should be brought up on charges of High Crimes and Misdemeanors for "American Generational Thievery."

And we the people must put an end to your trickery with Baseline Budgeting!




Less than $1 trillion in cut over 10 years for $1 trillion in new debt now is not acceptable. NO MORE DEBT is acceptable, Period. Also, any hustler on the street can tell you that $1 today is worth far more than $1 is the future..you have to account for interest, inflation and devaluation at the very least, so this dollar for dollar nonsense is a sham!


It would seem people did exactly what the President asked them to do in regard to voicing their views. However, not one person suggested their congressman compromise. I have no idea how Mr. Nunes plans on voting but what if he wanted to compromise and this is all he heard from his constituents? 


I'm not really that politically savvy, even though I do follow it for my own interest in the psychology of it all. I'm deeply interested in how we interact with one another, in all aspects of life. I can't offer the best policy for our government to enact to solve our debt situation. Most of the stuff these professionals deal with is well beyond me. However, I can tell you one thing with a large degree of certainty, not compromising is very rarely a solution to any problem. 


Our attitude toward one another is deeply troubling to me, and not just in the political arena. Somewhere along the way we made a conscientious decision to stick to our guns on every issue, large and small, and dismiss anything that isn't in alignment with our personal belief. We gravitate to people that share our opinion and demonize and vilify everyone that offers a differing view. 


Obviously, not everyone that lives in this area believes our congressman shouldn't compromise, it's mathematically nearly impossible. And the polls even suggest the people that believe in compromise are much larger than those who don't. Yet, not one person contacted their representative to voice this opinion. 


In the end, we deserve everything our apathy brings us. There is nothing wrong with the people that don't believe we should work together contacting their congressman and letting him know how they feel, in fact they were encouraged to do so by the President. But there is something very wrong with no one contacting him to let him know they simply believe in the idea of compromise. It is shameful and we will no doubt reap the harvest we've sowed. 



Silver Lining

It's sad we find ourselves in a crisis. Even more sad is the fact it wouldn't be a crisis if we didn't create it. Most Americans, regardless of political slant, agree our government needs to rein in its spending. And that battle, whenever it does take place, will not be an easy one. None of us want to give up things we have. Even members on the right that have strong convictions about government aid and assistance have no desire to give up their social security or Medicare. And I suspect the day when people get the benefit of healthcare at much lowers prices they will be reluctant to give up that government spending cut as well. However, this battle did not have to take place right now. It was a stubborn group of people, elected by a fringe element of the Republican Party, that created this specific crisis. One in which payments to service members, elderly, disabled, and a whole host of others that receive payments from the government are in serious jeopardy of being stopped. On top of that, and much more detrimental to all of us in the long term, is the very real chance of having our nation's credit rating lowered, even if we do meet our deadline.

However, all is not lost. Last month I authored a piece laying out my vision of the GOP freeing itself from the shackles of the Tea Party. This debt ceiling crisis the Tea Party has created plays right into that formula. John Boehner, even though he seems to be having tremendous difficulty at this very moment rallying the Tea Party members to support his legislation, finds himself in a win-win situation. Perhaps, the best win condition is to not get a bill passed because members of his own party won't get on board. This will allow him to give up on them and use compromise (that means work together for any Tea Party member that reads this) to pass bipartisan legislation. This will go over well with the American public. However, if he does strong arm enough of the Tea Party representatives and offers them enough goodies to sign on and support his bill, the constituents of these Tea Party representatives will not be happy. To add salt to the wound, if the Tea Party members sign on to this and compromise their convictions and it's ultimately shot down by the Senate then it really doesn't set well to the Tea Party constituents. Either way it's a win for the country, regardless if you're a Democrat or a Republican.



This will hardly solve our problems. But it will allow a climate to exist that embraces working together from this point forward. Our branches of government are controlled by different parties and there is nothing wrong with that. That is until these branches decide they can never agree on anything the other caucus presents. Nothing will ever get done if we use this model. Times are tough and people aren't happy with the economic situations they find themselves in, I certainly can relate. But this doesn't diminish the fact we still have to solve problems and find solutions that we can enact to get us back on the right track. We will undeniably debate the course we take and the best policies to use but we have to do something, nothing is not an option. Defaulting on our debt is the worst possible solution and the overwhelming amount of Americans agree on this. Yet, we still find ourselves held hostage by an extreme element of one party. And to this point that party has yet to figure out how to deal with them. Send them to the corner, give them a timeout, swat their bottom, take away their toys, do whatever you would normally do to control your out of control, whiny, bratty, spoiled rotten child, I don't care, just do something about it.

Look Alikes

I'm always amazed how movies that portray real people actually try really hard to make the actors look like their real counterparts. Even a movie like Too Big To Fail, where I wouldn't know what the majority of the real people looked like, made a great effort.


Paul Giamatti as Ben Bernanke


Billy Crudup as Timothy Geithner


William Hurt as Hank Paulson


Bill Pullman as Jamie Dimon


Tony Shalhoub as John Mack


This poor lady as Nanci Pelosi

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Customer Service

I'm a big stickler for customer service. Even though our country has landed on difficult financial times there have been some positives to emerge. One thing that has jumped out at me is the customer service provided by several of the companies I deal with has greatly improved. I've always appreciated the customer service I receive from Direct TV and Verizon but they seem even better lately. And last week I had to deal with Comcast for my internet and I was treated like royalty all around. I was even going to cancel my call for service and the technician basically talked me into letting him come out and check my lines. When he got here he discovered some issues and had to block traffic and call two other trucks out to repair the cables. 

So that now makes three companies I deal with high on my list when it comes to customer service. And because this guy was so good and professional I went out of my way to contact Comcast and let them know how pleased and impressed I was. They assured me they would pass on the information to the proper channels. So this guy treats me well and in return I treat him well, strange how that works huh? Maybe we should implement this tactic more often when we deal with one another.

Now I'm not much of a consumer of alcohol. It tastes alright to me but soda tastes a heck of a lot better. I can't stand being around drunk people and you would be hard pressed finding many people that have ever seen me drunk, even though I certainly have been. Lastly, I can't deal with the hangovers at my age. When I was younger if I even had a hangover it lasted for a morning. As I got a few years older it lasted for a day. A few years later it got to the point where two mornings were effected from one night of drinking. I'm a big fan of happiness and one night of fun (that I didn't even remember) wasn't worth one entire day of misery and another morning of still feeling a little bit off. 

When I do drink I'm a total wuss and drink only American beers, mostly Bud Light. I like Coors Light fine too. I don't really enjoy dark beers at all. Corona tastes pretty good to me but that's about the only foreign beer I drink.  I have a buddy who is a total hoot (I'm not sure I've ever used that word to describe someone but it's the perfect description of this guy). He's just all around fun and very amusing. He usually takes a trip to Europe, mainly the Netherlands, once a year. I haven't gone with him, yet, but I'm sure it would be a blast. After his latest trip he decided to write back to a company in the Netherlands and let them know what he thinks of their product. Even though I'm not a big fan of beer, and especially foreign beer, I am going to go out of my way to drink a Heineken very soon. Here is his letter.

Dear Heineken,

Sorry this is in English, as a narrow minded American, it’s the only language I know. Anyhow, I wanted to make a comment. I had a chance to say this at the "Heineken Experience," where customers are allowed to record a message about your beer. But, well--after spending a few days in your fine city, I was a bit paranoid about speaking out loud, in public--into a camera. So here is what I wanted to convey. The beer on your side of the world is amazing. I brag to all my friends about how clean tasting Heineken is. But no one believes me, because your beer tastes heavily different over here. Is there anything that can be done about this? I bought one of your keg coolers, in hopes of changing this, but it was to no avail. Or are we, as a country, doomed to sub-Heineken standards because we routinely piss off the world? If that’s the reason, well-I can’t completely fault you. Otherwise could you please look into just what causes the taste change?
I will continue to be a loyal customer, because I love your beer—but that doesn’t change the fact that everything I have written is true.  

HEINEKEN

Dear Mr. Rogers,

Thank you for your comment. We sincerely hope that you had a pleasant stay in The Netherlands.

It is surprising to see that Heineken tastes different in the USA. There is no Heineken Brewery in the USA, so all Heineken beer that you can find there, comes directly from Holland. Here at our Brewery in Zoeterwoude, we bottle beer for export to the USA and for use in The Netherlands. The beer is identical in both bottles and it comes from the same kettle. Therefore, a difference in taste shouldn't, in theory, be possible.

However, the bottles have a long way to go before they reach The States and there are factors as sunlight and weather conditions that might influence the quality of the beer, if the bottles are not stored in a proper way. We try to control the track from the Brewery in Zoeterwoude to the consumer in The States as best as we can, but I fear that we cannot apply supervision on every liquor store or bar in the states. Besides, the difference in taste of these influences should be minor and not recognizable for even a very experienced beer drinker.

The difference in taste might therefore be a cultural thing. Maybe the lousy weather in The Netherlands or the holiday feeling gives a better taste to the beer.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Joram Bek
Heineken Consumenten Service

Monday, July 25, 2011

Facts. Facts. We Don't Need No Stinking Facts.

Big fan of PolitiFact. Tonight I will share some of their recent findings on some of the more current issues. They give a lot of politicians a "half true" rating and I won't address any of those. If something is half true then we all know one side will see the truth and the other side will see the false.


"When the Republicans were in charge, they actually expanded government health care with the prescription drug program." ~ Ron Paul -- TRUE

Paul made this statement when talking about Republicans trying to repeal Obamacare. He went on to add, "when we did have the chance, when the Republicans were in charge, they actually expanded government health care..."

"Most countries have no debt ceiling." ~ Arianna Huffington -- MOSTLY TRUE

In a report published last February, the Government Accountability Office, the oversight arm of Congress, described the U.S. system as fairly unusual, since the U.S. debt ceiling process moves independently of the general budgeting process.

Says Ronald Reagan "repeatedly talked about how irresponsible it would be to allow the full faith and credit of the United States to be impaired in any kind of way." ~ President Obama -- MOSTLY TRUE

"Unfortunately, Congress consistently brings the government to the edge of default before facing its responsibility. This brinkmanship threatens the holders of government bonds and those who rely on Social Security and veterans benefits. Interest rates would skyrocket, instability would occur in financial markets, and the federal deficit would soar. The United States has a special responsibility to itself and the world to meet its obligations. It means we have a well-earned reputation for reliability and credibility -- two things that set us apart from much of the world." ~ Ronald Reagan

"Federal law requires that hospitals treat people whether or not they can pay. So someone (who) doesn’t have health insurance --  they can go to the hospital and get free care." ~ Mitt Romney -- BARELY TRUE

 He implies that hospitals are required to provide more free care than is actually mandated. In fact, the law just requires stabilizing treatment in an emergency. We rate his claim Barely True.

"Every time we've cut the capital gains tax, the economy has grown. Whenever we raise the capital gains tax, it's been damaged." ~ Grover Norquist -- FALSE

"The best tax policy would not have a difference as between capital gains and ordinary income because there is no compelling reason for any such distinction, and it enormously complicates the Internal Revenue Code. We had such a best policy, briefly, following passage of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, in Reagan's second term. Everything was taxed at a top rate of 28 percent (with a few minor deviations). Does Norquist think that was so bad? For heaven's sake, why? And we have had extraordinarily low rates on capital gains since the first years of the Bush II Administartion (and still have them today). Does Norquist think the economy has done splendidly during the ensuing years? What have I missed?" ~ David Rosenbloom, a tax law professor at New York University

"The clear majority of Republican voters think that any deficit reduction package should have a balanced approach and should include some revenues." ~ Obama -- BARELY TRUE

In conclusion, we don't find that "poll after poll" showed a "clear majority" of Republicans supporting tax increases. We found one recent poll that supported Obama's statement and two other polls that showed a much more evenly divided picture. We rate it Barely True. 

"Eighty percent of the American people support an approach (to federal budget problems) that includes revenues and includes cuts." ~ Obama -- MOSTLY TRUE

Even the best poll doesn't show support quite that high -- he would more accurately have accounted for the small numbers that support only tax increases or were unsure, putting the number at 70 percent. But his overall point is correct that polls show most Americans support a balanced approach when given a choice between cutting spending or raising taxes. So we rate his statement Mostly True.

Says scientists are "in dispute" over whether being gay is a choice. ~ Tim Pawlenty -- FALSE

Pawlenty said that scientists are "in dispute" about whether being gay is a choice or not. We think most people would interpret that to mean sexual orientation -- that is, attractions and impulses -- rather than sexual behavior. And on that question, it seems that the American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the Human Rights Campaign and even the Family Research Council are in agreement. So we rate Pawlenty’s statement False.

"There are actually half a million fewer government employees now than there were when (President Barack) Obama took office." ~ Paul Krugman -- TRUE

The decline in government workers has certainly had an impact on the overall employment picture. Since the recession officially ended in June 2009, private payrolls have increased by more than 1 million workers, but government payrolls have declined by 493,000 -- cutting the number of jobs created almost in half.

"Fifty-one percent -- that is, a majority of American households -- paid no income tax in 2009. Zero. Zip. Nada." ~ Paul Cornyn -- TRUE

A full understanding of U.S. tax policy requires a lot of additional context that Cornyn didn’t supply. Still, at PolitiFact, words matter, and on the specific point Cornyn was making -- that a majority of American households paid no income tax in 2009 -- he not only accurately cited a credible study but also took care to cite a specific year and to explain that he only meant to refer to federal income taxes. So we rate Cornyn’s statement True.

"My husband and I have never gotten a penny of money from the farm." ~ Michele Bachmann -- FALSE

Unless or until Bachmann steps forward to explain the discrepancy between her financial disclosure statements and her public pronouncements, we have to rely on the disclosures, which say she received at least $32,501 in income. So we rate her claim as False.

"We've got more revenue than we ever have." ~ Jim DeMint -- FALSE

DeMint was wrong using either standard. He was off by a few years using raw dollar figures. And when you use tax revenue as a share of gross domestic product -- which is a better yardstick for this sort of comparison -- he was off by six decades. So we rate DeMint’s statement False.

Then-Sen. Barack Obama "refused to raise the debt ceiling because he said President Bush had failed in leadership." ~ Michele Bachmann -- TRUE

Obama said that.

"We're going to be looking at $8 billion a day that we're going to be pouring into foreign countries in order to import that make-up fuel that we're going to need to take the place of what we could have gotten out of the gulf." ~ Sarah Palin -- LIAR, LIAR PANTS ON FIRE

Hey, it's math, what did you expect?